October 25

How One Lawyer’s Crusade Could Change Football Forever ( Essay 2)

How One Lawyer’s Crusade Could Change Football Forever

Tyler Lima                                                                                                                                                            ENG101

(Seconded Article link: https://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/vahe-gregorian/article187534063.html)

 

In this article Michael Sokolove fights to connect serious head injuries to the sport. Jason luckasevic was studying to pass the bar exam, which he passed on the first try. Not long after passing he was hired right out of school. By 2000 a Pittsburgh firm hired him. “lawyering for the working people”, was the ambition of Goldberg, Perksy and white. This was a new firm Luckasevic had joined to move on up and start making big bucks.

 

Luckasevic’s older brother Todd was working in a medical examiner office, under Bennet Omalu a forensic Pathologist. Omalu performed autopsy on former football player Mike Webster, who had passed away at the age of fifty suffering from dementia. While reviewing MR. Webster brain he noted damage similar to what boxers suffer “drunk punch” syndrome. Five more cases over a few years with similar conditions. Tangled brain tissue and sharing characteristics of Alzheimer Disease.

 

By 2005, Omalu published his findings in the Journal of Neurosurgery. He stated seeing chronic tramatic encephalopathy, or C.T.E. This is when the NFL responded with affiliated doctors demanded Mr. Omalu retract his article. NFL said “ preposterous and misinterpretation of facts”. At this point Omalu seeked to get some legal help from Todd’s younger brother Jason Luckasevic.

 

Luckasevic had met with retired NFL players in 2006. Witch those players confirmed Omalu’s studies when looking at the brain tissue under a microscope. Luckasevic witnessed the suffering ranging from headaches, memory loss, depression and sleeplessness. Building a case against the NFL takes gaining the trust of those retired players, who were the victims. Luckasevic said  “they have to feel they have a friendship with you before there’s a business relationship,” Luckasevic said. “They have to have your cellphone number. They’ll keep calling and calling and calling until they get you, and you’ll have a conversation, and then they’ll call you back an hour later and ask the same questions and have the same conversation. This is a clear sign of having some extensive brain damage, without doing any testing.

 

It seemed that the NFL is losing the fight to deny C.T.E claims or its link to brain damage amongst players and retied ones. Other then changing rules to make football less violent and improving equipment. There will always be injuries but its about helping the players who have these conditions and finding ways to fix the problem not deny and act like its not happening. The NFL needs to admit there wrong and help save the lives of these players.


Posted October 25, 2018 by tylerlima95 in category Uncategorized

2 thoughts on “How One Lawyer’s Crusade Could Change Football Forever ( Essay 2)

  1. noah filipe

    Overall I think you did a solid job nailing the key points of the article. I think you should explain more on your opinions on C.T.E and what you think the NFL should do to help compensate the retired athletes affected. Also you should link another article that’s similar to this one so you can compare the two.I diden’t catch to any grammatical errors but there are a few here and there that I would double check.

    Reply
  2. hpappas

    You do a pretty good job here capturing summary of the first part of article about discovery of CTE and Luckasevic’s lawsuit against NFL, though could use more info from second part of article about more general info of how this has affected and might affect football (how is it alike and different from boxing and tobacco use?).

    You seem to be going para. by para. through first part of article–in places, you could move more quickly. Watch out to make sure your wording is either your own or put in quotation marks. Though I didn’t take the time to trace back for unintentional plagiarism, there were places where there was at least quite heavy “echo” of the original wording.

    A few other issues for revision:
    –Assignment suggests a short intro para. to orient reader before launching into summary of article (beginning of para. 2 is a good place to start summary).

    –Response is quite minimal, only really a part of last para. That needs to be developed more, so that response is roughly balanced in length with summary. How does this affect your own attitude towards football, either as player or fan? How do you think NFL should respond?

    –I see a link to a second source, but can’t tell where that source is used. Be sure to include in-text citation to show where you use info from sources. Then you need a Works Cited with the two sources in MLA format.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*